. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 21.

Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):779–792. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-12-0372

Table 4.

Results of the within-condition regression analyses relating scaled intelligibility and speech severity.

Group	Condition	F	p	Adjusted r²
Control	Habitual	F(1, 31) = 37.995	<.001	.54
	Clear	F(1, 31) = 20.058	<.001	.38
	Loud	F(1, 31) = 23.640	<.001	.42
	Slow	F(1, 31) = 23.027	<.001	.42
MS	Habitual	F(1, 29) = 167.709	<.001	.85
	Clear	F(1, 29) = 57.752	<.001	.66
	Loud	F(1, 28) = 67.591	<.001	.70
	Slow	F(1, 29) = 68.549	<.001	.70
PD	Habitual	F(1, 15) = 122.690	<.001	.89
	Clear	F(1, 15) = 26.286	<.001	.63
	Loud	F(1, 15) = 41.682	<.001	.73
	Slow	F(1, 15) = 19.014	<.001	.55

Note. Boldface indicates nonhabitual conditions for which the strength of the relationship between intelligibility and speech severity was significantly weaker versus habitual (p < .05, one-tailed).