Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;8(29):47136–47153. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17559

Table 2. Orthogonal experimental drug design (OEDD).

A B C D PS ZP PDI % EE (OA) % EE (DOX) % EE (Comb.) Range (PS-EE) Batch ID
Cumulative impact of the study factors on physicochemical attributes at the stated level 1 1 1 1 119.73 ± 7.27 −18.26 ± 5.22 0.17 ± 0.08 59.73 ± 4.21 46.77 ± 3.15 53.25 ± 3.68 66.49 A1B1C1D1-F1
2 1 2 2 86.27 ± 22.02 −23.49 ± 8.72 0.19 ± 0.02 70.61 ± 3.56 62.60 ± 3 66.60 ± 3.28 19.66 A1B2C2D2-F2
3 1 3 3 103.93 ± 7.15 −18.52 ± 10.38 0.24 ± 0.03 69.41 ± 2.84 89.78 ± 1.03 79.60 ± 1.93 24.34 A1B3C3D3-F3
4 2 1 3 88.17 ± 10.19 −16.37 ± 3.23 0.26 ± 0.04 79.63 ± 4.61 79.35 ± 3.46 79.49 ± 4.04 8.68 A2B1C2D3-F4
5 2 2 1 121.52 ± 13.93 −25.40 ± 3.01 0.28 ± 0.01 78.50 ± 8.63 85.42 ± 3.95 81.96 ± 6.29 39.56 A2B2C3D1-F5
6 2 3 2 117.27 ± 6.88 −19.02 ± 5.89 0.33 ± 0.03 91.84 ± 1.66 85.37 ± 18.24 88.60 ± 9.95 28.66 A2B3C1D2-F6
7 3 1 2 147.53 ± 10.72 −20.44 ± 12.76 0.32 ± 0.02 81.53 ± 3.68 71.13 ± 6.57 76.33 ± 5.12 71.20 A3B1C3D2-F7
8 3 2 3 194.70 ± 10.29 −17.09 ± 3.5 0.34 ± 0.04 77.67 ± 3.59 50.24 ± 8.64 63.95 ± 6.12 130.75 A3B2C1D3-F8
9 3 3 1 176.37 5.82 −13.86 ± 1.91 0.31 ± 0.03 65.30 ± 4.93 94.77 ± 11.15 80.03 ± 8.04 96.33 A3B3C2D1-F9
K1 199.45 209.07 205.8 215.24 K1 is the sum of %EE (Comb.) at level 1
K2 250.05 212.51 226.12 231.53 K2 is the sum of %EE (Comb.) at level 2
K3 220.31 248.23 237.89 223.04 K3 is the sum of %EE (Comb.) at level 3
k1 66.48 69.69 68.6 71.75 k1 is the average of K1
k2 83.35 70.84 75.37 77.18 k2 is the average of K2
k3 73.43 82.74 79.3 74.35 k3 is the average of K3
R 16.87 13.05 10.7 5.43 R is the range difference at three levels (k1,k2,k3)
A2 B3 C3 D2 A possible best drug design A2B3C3D2