Skip to main content
. 2017 May 17;8(30):49773–49782. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17937

Table 6. Studies evaluating cfDNA EGFR sensitive mutations in patients with NSCLC.

Study Detection Method Mutated patients (n) Sensitivity (%) (n/total) Specificity (%) (n/total) Concordance (%) (n/total)
Bai et al. [10] DHPLC 77 81.8 (63/77) 89.5 (137/153) 74.0 (200/230)
Huang et al. [53] DHPLC 296 63.5 (188/296) 84.6 (445/526) 77.0 (633/822)
Liu et al. [35] ARMS 40 67.5 (27/40) 100.0 (46/46) 84.9 (73/86)
Kim et al. [54] PNA-PCR 35 17.1 (6/35) 100.0 (5/5) 27.5 (11/40)
Zhao et al. [55] Mutant-enriched PCR 45 35.6 (16/45) 95.5 (63/66) 71.2 (79/111)
Wang et al. [36] ARMS 68 22.1 (15/68) 97.0 (64/66) 59.0 (79/134)
Jing et al. [56] HRMA 45 66.4 (29/45) 97.3 (73/75) 85.0 (102/120)
Weber et al. [57] Cobas EGFR test 28 60.7 (17/28) 96.4 (162/168) 91.3 (179/196)
Yu et al. [58] ddPCR 93 61.3 (57/93) 96.7 (118/122) 81.4 (175/215)
Zhu et al. [59] ddPCR 37 81.1 (30/37) 97.0 (131/135) 93.6 (161/172)

Abbreviations: DHPLC, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography; ARMS, amplification refractory mutation system; PNA, peptide nucleic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HRMA, high resolution melting analysis.