Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 4;8(30):50091–50097. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15096

Table 3. Tea consumption and the risk of oral cancer stratified by milk drinking status.

Variables Milk drinking Non-milk drinking
Cases/Controls OR(95%CI)a Cases/Controls OR(95%CI)a
Tea consumption
No 139/534 1.00 206/533 1.00
Yes 28/179 0.62(0.39-0.98) 48/152 0.81(0.55-1.19)
Duration of tea consumption (years)
No 139/534 1.00 206/533 1.00
<20 10/100 0.42(0.21-0.84) 21/69 0.72(0.42-1.24)
≥20 18/79 0.84(0.48-1.48) 27/83 0.89(0.55-1.44)
Quantity of tea consumed (ml/day)
No 139/534 1.00 206/533 1.00
<500 13/104 0.49(0.27-0.92) 26/77 0.85(0.52-1.38)
≥500 15/75 0.79(0.43-1.46) 22/75 0.77(0.46-1.31)
Concentration of tea consumed
No 139/534 1.00 206/533 1.00
Weak 10/75 0.48(0.24-0.98) 17/54 0.78(0.44-1.40)
Moderate 15/88 0.68(0.38-1.23) 21/75 0.77(0.46-1.29)
Strong 3/16 0.73(0.21-2.56) 10/23 1.15(0.54-2.48)
Types of tea
No 139/535 1.00 206/534 1.00
Green tea 14/100 0.55(0.30-0.99) 26/76 0.91(0.56-1.48)
Oolong tea 9/41 0.90(0.42-1.96) 13/43 0.76(0.40-1.47)
Others 5/37 0.47(0.18-1.25) 9/32 0.77(0.36-1.66)

aORs were adjusted for age(y), gender, education level, marital status, residence, body mass index and denture wearing.