Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;12(8):e0183491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183491

Table 2. Measured NGF levels (mean level with standard deviation in parentheses) according to the subgroups.

No-CIPN CIPN p-value
Baseline NGF (pg/ml) Follow-up NGF (pg/ml) Baseline NGF (pg/ml) Follow-up NGF (pg/ml)
Previous chemotherapy
Yes (n = 18), mean(SD) 12.2(6.61) 8.03(5.73) 9.4(5.55) 5.67(4.45) 0.964
No (n = 27), mean(SD) 8.26(3.43) 10.34(7.98) 10.60(5.83) 7.25(4.19) 0.048*
Disease
Multiple myeloma (n = 32), mean(SD) 9.68(4.75) 9.98(8.23) 10.31(5.92) 5.54(3.84) 0.063
Lymphoma (n = 11), mean(SD) 7.22(3.35) 7.57(4.21) 10.42(4.93) 8.66(4.64) 0.614
Intervention during the study
Bortezomib only (n = 22), mean(SD) 11.2(5.12) 7.84(7.22) 11.1(5.49) 7.15(3.34) 0.810
Thalidomide only (n = 7), median [IQR] 4.69[3.99–5.39] 10.1[9.67–10.5] 5.85[3.81–6.97] 0.80[0.69–1.56] 0.095
Vincristine only (n = 10), mean(SD) 9.62(6.09) 8.44(4.13) 12.34(4.47) 7.11(5.77) 0.300
Combination (n = 6), median [IQR] 9.21[7.82–11.1] 8.86[7.57–19.2] 4.56[3.95–11.6] 12.2[9.37–12.4] 0.700
Response
CR (n = 10), mean(SD) 12.4(6.41) 7.17(5.79) 12.6(7.06) 5.90(5.12) 0.686
PR (n = 26), mean(SD) 9.28(4.86) 8.00(5.50) 9.39(5.46) 7.21(4.18) 0.682
Others (n = 9), median [IQR] 8.46[5.87–10.70] 12.0 [11.4–20.8] 8.47[7.08–10.40] 4.70[4.07–7.19] 0.095

*p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

p-value calculated by the comparison of △NGF (follow-up NGF level–baseline NGF level) between the CIPN group and the no-CIPN group.