Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Dec 21;36(4):983–993. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2643565

TABLE II.

Comparison between Frequency selective AS-PAM and FD-PAM

Experimental Data

Back-propagation method	Bandwidth (#bins)	Runtime (Sec)	FWHM (Axial)			SBNR>10 (# images)
Back-propagation method	Bandwidth (#bins)	Runtime (Sec)	Harmonics	Ultra-harmonics	Broad-band	Harmonics	Ultra-harmonics	Broad-band
FD-PAM	#42 #126	0.97±0.01 2.85±0.02	17.3±4.8 (med: 6.2)	14.3±3.0 (med: 13.4)	14.4±4.0 (med: 11.8)	29.6±21.1 (#214/780)	24.8±17.7 (#21/780)	18.8±6.6 (#9/780)
AS-PAM	#42 #126	0.18±0.002 0.48±0.001	22.1±6.0 (med: 0.6)	20.6±5.7 (med: 19.6)	23.4±6.2 (med:20.3)	28.2±17.7 (#204/780)	23.1±15.0 (#23/780)	19.2±11.7 (#9/780)

TD-PAM	6.42 MHz	44.5±0.6	All frequencies 18.8±5.9mm(med: 17.4)			All frequencies 26±16.8 (#106/780)

FWHM is expressed in mm. The FWHM was estimated by data-fit of the line profiles.