Table 1.
TAM receptor | Analysis methods | ProS | Gas6 | ||||
kon × 104 (M−1⋅s−1) | koff × 10−4 (s−1) | Kd (nM) | kon × 104 (M−1⋅s−1) | koff × 10−4 (s−1) | Kd (nM) | ||
Axl | SPR | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 37.6 ± 0.19 | 3.00 ± 0.01 | 0.80 ± 0.01 |
Axl | BLI | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 77.7 ± 1.52 | 4.84 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.02 |
Mer | SPR | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 6.00 ± 0.02 | 57.8 ± 0.58 | 5.47 ± 0.04 | 11.9 ± 0.03 | 21.7 ± 0.27 |
Mer | BLI | 2.37 ± 0.02 | 9.39 ± 0.09 | 39.6 ± 0.81 | 11.3 ± 0.06 | 15.1 ± 0.09 | 13.4 ± 0.19 |
Tyro3 | SPR | 6.00 ± 0.05 | 9.70 ± 0.03 | 16.2 ± 0.23 | 10.9 ± 0.17 | 25.3 ± 0.12 | 23.3 ± 0.54 |
Tyro3 | BLI | 8.82 ± 0.12 | 22.0 ± 0.19 | 24.9 ± 0.61 | 21.3 ± 0.27 | 64.8 ± 0.32 | 30.5 ± 0.61 |
The association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants for each ligand–receptor pair were determined by BLI (biolayer interferometry) and SPR (surface plasmon resonance). N.D., not detected.