Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 12;117(3):637–642. doi: 10.1007/s13760-017-0830-7

Table 1.

Characteristics of WUS and DUS patients

All cases (n = 61) WUS (n = 42) DUS (n = 19) P value for differences DUS–WUS
Age, median (SD) 72 (15) 70 (15) 78 (14) p = 0.06 (t)
Female sex, n (%) 35 (57%) 23 (55%) 12 (63%) p = 0.59 (Χ)
Prestroke mRS ≥3, n (%) 4 (7%) 3 (7%) 1 (5%) p = 1.0 (Χ)
Posterior circulation ischemia, n (%) 8 (13%) 5 (12%) 3 (16%) p = 0.70 (Χ)
Time between LSW and presentation at ED in minutes, mean (SD) 461 (137) 506 (135) 362 (75) p < 0.01 ( t )
NIHSS at presentation, median (SD) 5 (3.7) 5 (3.9) 6 (3.3) p = 0.61 (t)
Imaging characteristics for anterior circulation ischemia (n = 53)
ASPECTS, median (SD) 10 (1.7) 10 (1.4) 10 (2.2) p = 0.21 (t)
Collateral supply <50%, n (%) 3 (7%) 2 (7%) 1 (8%) p = 1.0 (Χ)
Therapy eligibility
Eligible for IVTa, n (%) 49 (80%) 34 (81%) 15 (79%)
Eligible for IATa, n (%) 9 (15%) 7 (17%) 2 (11%)
IAT performed, n 4 (44%) 3 (43%) 1 (50%)
Outcome
Good outcome (mRS ≤2) after 90 days, n (%) 26 (43%) 22 (52%) 4 (22%) p = 0.05 ( Χ )

Significant p values <0.05 are shown in bold

aEligibility is assessed using the currently accepted criteria excluding the criterion of time window <4.5 h (IVT) or <6 h (IAT)

(t) independent t test, (Χ) Chi-square test