Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;4(4):041302. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.4.041302

Table 1.

Testing phase fivefold cross-validation: the quantitative MRI prostate segmentation performance results of comparing AAM + AlexNet (Alex), HNN MRI alone (HNN_mri), HNN MRI + CED (HNN_ced) methods in four metrics of DSC (%), Jaccard index (IoU) (%), HDRFDST (mm), and AVGDIST (mm). Best performance methods are shown in bold.

  DSC (%) Jaccard (IoU) (%) HDRFDIST (mm) AVGDIST (mm)
  Alex HNN_mri HNN_ced Alex HNN_mri HNN_ced Alex HNN_mri HNN_ced Alex HNNMRI HNN_ced
Mean 81.03 86.86 89.77 68.58 77.48 81.59 15.25 17.41 13.52 0.37 0.34 0.16
Std 6.34 7.60 3.29 8.72 10.50 5.18 9.27 11.72 7.87 0.22 0.54 0.08
Median 82.34 89.30 90.33 69.98 80.66 82.37 12.54 13.20 11.33 0.32 0.16 0.13
Min 56.45 52.07 71.13 39.32 35.20 55.20 4.12 4.24 4.24 0.08 0.06 0.06
Max 94.39 94.65 94.62 89.39 89.84 89.79 55.52 93.10 63.54 1.68 4.04 0.69