Table 2.

Quantitative comparisons between proposed method and other notable methods from the literature.

Methods	DSC + Std. dev (%)	HDRFDIST (mm)	AVGDIST (mm)	Images	Evaluation	Trim ($\alpha :0.95$)
Klein et al.1	$84.40\pm 3.10$	$10.20\pm 2.60$	$2.50\pm 1.40$	50	Leave-one-out	Yes
Toth and Madabhushi4	$87.66\pm 4.97$		$1.51\pm 0.78$	108	Fivefold validation	Yes
Liao et al.7	$86.70\pm 2.20$	$8.20\pm 2.50$	$1.90\pm 1.60$	30	Leave-one-out	Yes
Guo et al.8	$87.10\pm 4.20$	$8.12\pm 2.89$	$1.66\pm 0.49$	66	Twofold validation	Yes
Milletari et al.9	$86.90\pm 3.30$	$5.71\pm 1.20$		Promise 12(80)	Train:50, test:30	Yes
Yu et al.10	89.43	5.54	1.95	Promise 12(80)	Train:50, test:30	Yes
Korsager et al.27	$88.00\pm 5.00$		$1.45\pm 0.41$	67	Leave-one-out	Yes
Chilali et al.28	$81.78\pm 5.86$	$13.52\pm 7.87$	$3.00\pm 1.50$	Promise 12(80)	Train:50, test:30	Yes
HNNmri+ced	$\mathbf{89.77}\pm \mathbf{3.29}$		$\mathbf{0.16}\pm \mathbf{0.08}$	250	Fivefold validation	No