Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2017 May 9;124(9):1403–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.059

Table 5.

Factors Influencing the Difference of Global Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Slope Values between before and after Disc Hemorrhage.

Univariate Model Multivariate Model 1* Multivariate Model 2
β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P
Age, per 1-yr older 0.000 (−0.035, 0.034) 0.98 0.66 0.82
White race (vs. nonwhite) −0.024 (−0.915, 0.867) 0.96 0.89 0.95
Female gender (vs. male) −0.411 (−1.265, 0.444) 0.34 0.30 0.17
CCT, per 1-μm thicker 0.007 (−0.001, 0.015) 0.10 0.32 0.44
Axial length, per 1-mm longer −0.072 (−0.425, 0.281) 0.68 0.73 0.85
Glaucoma diagnosis (vs. glaucoma suspect) −0.344 (−1.154, 0.466) 0.39 0.71 0.67
Baseline Visual field MD, per 1-dB better 0.071 (0.000, 0.143) 0.050 0.066 (0.000, 0.131) 0.049 0.45
Baseline Global RNFL thickness, per 1-μm thicker 0.019 (−0.007, 0.045) 0.14 0.57 0.20
Difference in IOP between before and after DH, per 1-mmHg higher −0.176 (−0.346, −0.005) 0.044 0.26 −0.176 (−0.337,−0.014) 0.034
Treatment intensification (vs. no change of treatment) 1.061 (0.353, 1.768) 0.004 1.007 (0.336, 1.678) 0.005

CCT = central corneal thickness; DH = disc hemorrhage; IOP = intraocular pressure; MD = mean deviation; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.

Values with statistical significance are shown in bold. β, regression coefficients.

Adjested for all variables in univariate regression model* or those excluding treatment intensification.