Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb 22;85:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.018

Table 2.

Predicted relapse rates during treatment period, by treatment group and selected potential moderators

XR-NTX TAU Main effect Interaction*

Attribute (Potential moderator) Proportion Relapsed (95% CI) P value
Alcohol intoxication: 30 days Yes 0.56 (0.33, 0.79) 0.58 (0.36, 0.73) 0.41 0.04
No 0.41 (0.32, 0.49) 0.65 (0.57, 0.73)
Non-heroin opioid use: 30 days Yes 0.45 (0.28, 0.63) 0.77 (0.61, 0.93) 0.03 0.14
No 0.41 (0.32, 0.50) 0.61 (0.53, 0.70)
Risk Assessment Battery – drug risk score
5 0.40 (0.27, 0.53) 0.74 (0.61, 0.87) 0.08 0.12
0 0.44 (0.36, 0.53) 0.61 (0.52, 0.69)
Addiction Severity Index – family/social score
0.2 0.36 (0.26, 0.46) 0.67 (0.57, 0.77) 0.07 0.07
0 0.46 (0.36, 0.56) 0.63 (0.53, 0.73)
Suicidal thoughts§ Yes 0.36 (0.08, 0.65) 0.83 (0.54, 1.00) 0.09 0.08
No 0.43 (0.35, 0.51) 0.62 (0.55, 0.70)
Mobility limitationsǁ Yes 0.47 (0.31, 0.64) 0.53 (0.36, 0.70) 0.20 0.09
No 0.42 (0.33, 0.51) 0.67 (0.59, 0.75)
*

Potential modifier*treatment group interaction, selected for those at P<0.15

From the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (McLellan et al., 1992).

From the Risk Assessment Battery (Watkins et al., 1992)

§

From the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al., 1998).

ǁ

From the Euroquol EQ-5D Quality of Life scale (EuroQol, 1990)