Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;67(660):e474–e482. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691085

Table 3.

Patients’ evaluation of practice activation

Practice activation n (%) [weighted %]
Always/often Sometimes Rarely/never Total N
GP available when needed 888 (77.8) [69.7] 187 (16.4) [23.1] 66 (5.8) [7.2] 1141
GP gave the patient enough time to say and ask questions 1037 (90.7) [90.1] 87 (7.6) [8.2] 20 (1.8) [1.7] 1144
GP encouraged the patient to talk about healthcare concerns 834 (74.9) [69.7] 182 (16.3) [16.5] 98 (8.8) [13.9] 1114
GP took patient’s concerns seriously 966 (86.3) [81.2] 115 (10.3) [15.0] 38 (3.4) [3.8] 1119
GP explained tests/treatments to the patient 961 (86.9) [88.5] 106 (9.6) [8.1] 39 (3.5) [3.4] 1106
GP told the patient about side effects 655 (64.9) [63.0] 178 (17.6) [15.1] 176 (17.4) [21.9] 1009
GP helped to arrange/organise right type of care 803 (85.4) [80.2] 93 (9.9) [14.4] 44 (4.7) [5.4] 940
GP had access to information 940 (86.8) [85.1] 101 (9.3) [9.8] 42 (3.9) [5.1] 1083
GP was aware of the recommendations from other professionals 686 (78.0) [70.4] 135 (15.4) [23.0] 58 (6.6) [6.6] 879
GP worked well with others 886 (89.1) [81.9] 79 (8.0) [13.8] 29 (2.9) [4.3] 994
Strongly agree/agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree/strongly disagree Total N
Delivering safe care was a top priority for the practice 1017 (90.6) [90.4] 85 (7.6) [6.9] 20 (1.8) [2.7] 1122