. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 22.

Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1535–1559. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0715-2

Table 4.

Reaction time analysis for Experiment 1a. GGe refers to Greenhouse-Geisser epsilon and is reported when significant, ges denotes generalized eta squared.

	Target present				Target absent

	Reaction time ANOVAs

Effect	F	GGe	p	ges	F	GGe	p	ges
Distractor cond (2, 24)	38.87	.65	< .001^***	.086	48.60	.51	<.001^***	.293
Set size (1, 12)	61.01	n.s.	< .001^***	.167	71.19	n.s.	<.001^***	.192
Distractor × Set (2, 24)	7.86	.97	.003^**	.001	17.21	.70	<.001^***	.026

	Reaction time – distractor type main effect

Comparison	F(1,12)		p	ges	F(1,12)		p	ges

26D(012) – 3D(012)	48.95		<.001^***	.12	55.98		<.001^***	.32
3D(012) - 3D(1)	69.29		<.001^***	.05	105.07		<.001^***	.02

	Slope – distractor type × set size interaction

Comparison	F(1,12)		p	ges	F(1,12)		p	ges

26D(012) – 3D(012)	10.00		.008^**	.01	26.09		<.001^***	.03
3D(012) - 3D(1)	0.08		.784	<.01	0.16		.694	<.01

Note:

^**

corresponds to significance below .01 level.,

^***

corresponds to significance below .001 level.