Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1535–1559. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0715-2

Table 6.

ANOVA’s and comparisons of computed D’ and criteria for Experiment 5. Comparisons are based on the sharing distribution and the number of conjunctive groups. Ges denotes generalized eta squared, d refers to Cohen’s d.

D’ Criteria

General ANOVAs

Effect F(1, 9) p ges F(1, 9) p ges

Set size 67.74 <.001*** .26 79.54 <.001*** .22
Exposure duration 32.85 <.001*** .22 110.40 <.001*** .45
Sharing 23.13 <.001*** .10 38.27 <.001*** .24
Groups 10.93 .009** .02 54.03 <.001*** .18
Sharing × Groups 5.99 .037* .01 11.95 .007** .03
Set size × Exposure 14.29 .004** .01
Set size × Sharing × Groups 6.99 .027* <.01
Groups × Set size 6.25 .034* .02
Exposure × Sharing × Groups 5.93 .038* .01

Distractor main effects

Comparison – distractor type F(1, 9) p ges F(1, 9) p ges

12D(1) – 3D(1) 0.58 .467 <.01 35.26 <.001*** .11
12D(012) – 3D(012) 14.58 .008** .30 35.60 <.001*** .33
12D(012) – 12D(1) 19.01 .005** .16 31.22 <.001*** .39
3D(012) – 3D(1) 21.09 .005** .05 51.90 <.001*** .06

Note: All post hoc p-values are Bonferroni-Holm corrected.

***

corresponds to significance below .001 level,

**

corresponds to significance below .01 level,

*

corresponds to significance below .05 level.