Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;51(5):460–468. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096050

Table 3.

Relationship between cluster and anatomical diagnosis (%*)

Clinical diagnosis Cluster1 Cluster2 Cluster3 Total
Dx aponeurosis n=76 (59) n=38 (61) n=80 (61) n=194 (61%)
Dx adductor n=19 (15) n=10 (16) n=16 (12) n=45 (14%)
Dx aponeurosis and Dx hip n=5 (4) n=1 (1) n=2 (2) n=8 (2%)
Dx hip n=23 (18) n=10 (16) n=30 (23) n=63 (20%)
Dx inguinal n=0 (0) n=1 (1) n=1 (1) n=2 (1%)
Dx hipflex n=4 (3) n=1 (1) n=3 (2) n=8 (2%)
Dx aponeurosis and Dx adductor n=0 (0) n=1 (1) n=0 (0) n=1 (0%)
Dx aponeurosis and Dx hipflex n=1 (1) n=0 (0) n=0 (0) n=1 (0%)
Total n=128 (40%) n=62 (19%) n=132 (41%) n=322

*Where % in parenthesis represents % of diagnosis within cluster or % of total number diagnosis.