Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;40(9):1226–1232. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0179

Table 3.

Logistic regression models for association between DPN and long-term glycemic control

Logistic regression model T1D
T2D
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Model 1: HbA1c AUC 1.48 (1.24; 1.77) <0.0001 1.13 (0.83; 1.52) 0.44
Model 2: model 1 + age and sex 1.44 (1.21; 1.71) <0.0001 1.12 (0.83; 1.53) 0.45
Model 2a: model 1 + age, sex, and height z scores 1.50 (1.25; 1.79) <0.0001 1.13 (0.83; 1.54) 0.44
Model 3: model 1 + BMI 1.49 (1.25; 1.78) <0.0001 1.12 (0.82; 1.53) 0.48
Model 4: model 1 + SBP and DBP 1.45 (1.21; 1.73) <0.0001 1.15 (0.84; 1.57) 0.37
Model 5: model 1 + TG 1.5 (1.24; 1.81) <0.0001 1.1 (0.8; 1.5) 0.56
Model 6: model 1 + ACR 1.55 (1.28; 1.89) <0.0001 1.07 (0.74; 1.54) 0.73
Model 7: model 1 + age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, TG, and ACR 1.53 (1.24; 1.88) <0.0001 1.05 (0.7; 1.56) 0.82

Outcome variable: DPN. Independent variable: HbA1c AUC. TG, triglycerides.