Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;14(6):952–959. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-538OC

Table 3.

Relationship between frailty markers, two frailty phenotypes, and short-term outcomes in survivors in study sample

  Hospital Discharge
Six Months after Discharge
  No Increased Disability (n = 36) Increased Disability (n = 41) P Value* No Increased Disability (n = 45) Died/Increased Disability (n = 31) P Value*
Frailty marker, n (%)            
 Weight loss/malnutrition 7 (19.4) 9 (22.0) 1.000 11 (24.4) 5 (16.1) 0.568
 Fatigue/low energy 8 (22.2) 10 (24.4) 1.000 8 (17.8) 9 (29.0) 0.292
 Decreased mobility 16 (44.4) 29 (70.7) 0.023 21 (46.7) 22 (71.0) 0.059
 Decreased strength 12 (33.3) 20 (48.8) 0.247 12 (26.7) 19 (61.3) 0.004
 Impaired moderate physical activity 17 (47.2) 28 (68.3) 0.069 21 (46.7) 23 (74.2) 0.020
 Cognitive impairment 4 (11.1) 5 (12.2) 1.000 5 (11.1) 4 (12.9) 1.000
 Sensory impairment 7 (19.4) 9 (22.0) 1.000 9 (20.0) 7 (22.6) 0.783
Two possible frailty phenotypes, n (%)
 ≥2 of 7 frailty markers 19 (52.8) 31 (75.6) 0.036 24 (53.3) 25 (80.7) 0.014
 ≥3 of 7 frailty markers 16 (44.4) 24 (58.5) 0.257 17 (37.8) 22 (71.0) 0.005
*

P value presented is from χ2 or Fisher exact test.

See Table E1 for an overview of the assessment and cutoff used to capture the frailty markers.

Frailty phenotype defined as at least two or three frailty markers of the seven markers.