Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;7(5):e013851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013851

Table 2.

Changes in lipid-modifying therapy

Dose change First event Second event
N (%)
Prior history of vascular disease
N (%)
Prior history of diabetes
N (%)
Prior history of vascular disease + diabetes
N (%)
Other high risk
N (%)
n=7716 n=2959 n=2940 n=5725 n=3928
Statin n=7380 n=2807 n=2773 n=5470 n=3725
 Switched therapy 169 (2.29) 51 (1.82) 58 (2.09) 103 (1.88) 61 (1.64)
 Augmented therapy 268 (3.63) 86 (3.06) 108 (3.89) 163 (2.98) 157 (4.21)
 Intensity decrease 129 (1.75) 34 (1.21) 56 (2.02) 82 (1.5) 75 (2.01)
 Intensity increase 887 (12.02) 399 (14.21) 339 (12.23) 874 (15.98) 264 (7.09)
Ezetimibe n=258 n=101 n=120 n=161 n=148
 Switched therapy 30 (11.63) 8 (7.92) 16 (13.33) 23 (14.29) 16 (10.81)
 Augmented therapy 163 (63.18) 59 (58.42) 74 (61.67) 88 (54.66) 91 (61.49)
Fibrate n=78 n=51 n=47 n=94 n=55
 Switched therapy 9 (11.54) 10 (19.61) 5 (10.64) 17 (18.09) 6 (10.91)
 Augmented therapy 35 (44.87) 20 (39.22) 27 (57.45) 33 (35.11) 28 (50.91)

Changes measured from first to last prescription in the 12-month follow-up period, ignoring gaps in therapy. Individuals receiving statins with ezetimibe were classified as statin users.