Skip to main content
. 2017 May 9;7(5):e015007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015007

Table 2.

Summary of simulation methods

Study name Simulation type Rationale for simulation type Model type Simulation duration Warm-up period Simulation run Simulation software
Anagnostou et al 21 DES* Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Repast Simphony
Au-Yeung et al 22 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported 10 Written in Java
Baboolal et al 23 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Simul8
Bowers et al 24 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Brailsford et al 10 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Simul8
Coats and Michalis25 DES No Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Simul8
Codrington-Virtue et al 26 DES Yes Specific 52 weeks Not reported Not reported Simul8
Codrington-Virtue et al 27 DES Yes Specific 24 hours 24 hours 50 Simul8
Coughlan et al 28 DES Yes Specific 3 weeks Not reported Not reported Simul8
Davies29 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Simul8
Eatock et al 11 DES Yes Specific 3 weeks Not reported 20 Simul8
Fletcher et al 12 DES Yes Generic Not reported Not reported Not reported Simul8
Günal and Pidd13 DES§ Yes Generic Not reported Not reported Not reported Micro Saint Sharp
Günal and Pidd30 DES Yes Generic 52 weeks 0 50 Micro Saint Sharp
Hay et al 31 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Arena
Komashie and Mousavi32 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Arena
Lane et al 33 SD** Yes Specific 24 hours Not reported 6 iThink
Lattimer et al 14 SD†† Yes Specific 52 weeks Not reported Not reported Stella
Maull et al 34 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Meng and Spedding35 DES Yes Specific Not reported Not reported Not reported MedModel
Mould et al 36 DES‡‡ Yes Specific 3 months 24 hours Not reported Simul8

*The authors used an agent-based simulation approach to model the ambulance service, but modelled the ED through a DES. These two individual models were then linked together to form a hybrid emergency services model.

†The authors used a Markovian queuing network, but computed the moments and densities of patient treatment time through a DES.

‡The authors used an SD model as part of a bigger picture, but modelled the ED through a DES.

§The authors used their ED model elsewhere37 to form a whole hospital DES model consisting of two other departments: inpatient and outpatient clinics.

¶The authors used their ED model elsewhere38 to form a whole hospital DES model consisting of three other components: inpatient bed management, waiting list management and outpatient clinics.

**The authors used their ED model elsewhere39 to explore the issues that arise when involving healthcare professionals in the process of model building.

††

The authors constructed the ED as a separate submodel which was not detailed in the paper. However, we believe this ED submodel14 is identical to the ED model reported in another included study.10

‡‡

The authors used their ED model elsewhere40 to illustrate the role of care pathways to the redesign of healthcare systems.

DES, discrete event simulation; ED, emergency department; SD, system dyamics.