Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 22;7:9108. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09203-3

Table 2.

The parameters of PLS-DA models obtained from 1H NMR analysis of serum, urine samples and fusion data (*latent variables).

Comparison Body fluid AUC training set AUC test set R2X/R2Y Q2(cum) p value Number of LV*
NN vs HC SERUM 0.96 0.83 0.515/0.478 0.478 4.00E-03 1
FA vs HC 0.90 0.71 0.546/0.660 0.413 8.22E-02 2
TC vs HC 0.82 0.73 0.770/0.327 0.103 5.80E-01 2
TC vs NN 0.86 0.63 0.736/0.393 0.258 3.99E-01 2
FA vs NN 0.70 0.30 0.914/0.257 0.057 8.80E-01 2
FA vs TC 0.79 0.33 0.592/0.394 0.190 9.98E-01 2
P vs HC 0.94 0.84 0.618/0.575 0.415 8.00E-03 2
NN vs HC URINE 0.91 0.61 0.534/0.574 0.312 3.96E-01 2
FA vs HC 0.92 1.00 0.445/0.629 0.442 9.64E-01 2
TC vs HC 0.96 0.73 0.608/0.622 0.459 1.28E-01 2
TC vs NN 0.74 0.49 1.00/0.244 0.123 3.26E-01 1
FA vs NN 0.89 0.40 0.565/0.508 0.343 1.47E-01 2
FA vs TC 0.74 0.76 1.00/0.257 0.134 2.94E-01 1
P vs HC 0.79 0.76 0.803/0.355 0.210 5.63E-01 2
NN vs HC URINE SERUM FUSION 0.93 0.82 0.423/0.766 0.631 3.47E-04 2
FA vs HC 0.92 1.00 0.312/0.898 0.494 4.35E-02 2
TC vs HC 0.99 0.93 0.299/0.928 0.785 1.40E-06 2
TC vs NN 0.95 0.32 0.500/0.704 0.574 7.00E-04 2
FA vs NN 0.84 0.20 0.425/0.702 0.413 8.90E-02 2
FA vs TC 0.83 0.46 0.333/0.818 0.456 5.80E-02 2
P vs HC 0.97 0.95 0.280/0.857 0.500 3.00E-03 2