Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;7(6):331–346. doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0481

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

(A, B) The node size and color correspond to the mean degree in each group. The edges are the average of the mean degrees of the two nodes thresholded at 0.5. There are consistent degree patterns across the groups, although there are local differences. (C) The two-sample t-statistic of the degree differences (controls—maltreated). There is no statistically significant node after the FDR correction at 0.05 level. (D) t-Statistic of age effect while accounting for sex and group variables. There is no significant reduction in node degree, so only positive t-statistic values are shown. Most nodes passed FDR at 0.05, showing a widespread connectivity increase in children. FDR, false discovery rate.