Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 3;165:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.021

Table 3.

Spearman correlations between drusen volume and retinal pigment epithelium-drusen-complex abnormal thinning volume indexed for visual acuity, cone-mediated sensitivity, and rod-intercept.

Visual Function Drusen Volume p-Value RAT Volume p-Value
Visual Acuity 0.017 0.876 0.017 0.875

Cone-mediated sensitivitya
  Mean −0.045 0.671 −0.312 0.003
  Minimum −0.053 0.616 −0.273 0.009
  Maximum −0.050 0.639 −0.328 0.002

Rod-mediated dark adaptationb −0.003 0.979 0.280 0.023

RAT = retinal pigment epithelium-drusen-complex abnormal thinning,

a

Mean sensitivity across zones 1 – 8,

b

N = 66 eyes

For the purposes of analysis, cone-mediated sensitivity was defined per subject as the average sensitivity across the 8 test targets within a 6° (1.73 mm) diameter, and also the average of each eye’s lowest sensitivity target (minimum), and the average of the eye’s highest sensitivity points for each eye (maximum). Age-adjusted N = 91 eyes (unless otherwise noted).