Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182764

Table 2. Logistic regression analysis for variables predicting religiosity by atheists (N = 29,348) and theists (N = 19,575) in Study 1, controlling for background variables.

Model 1 Model 2
B SE B eB [95% CI] B SE B eB [95% CI]
Intercept -1.08 <0.01 -0.99 <0.01
Gender 0.01* <0.01 1.01 [1.01–1.02] 0.01* <0.01 1.01 [1.01–1.02]
Age 0.46* -0.02 1.59 [1.53–1.64] 0.46* 0.02 1.58 [1.53–1.64]
Education 0.03 -0.02 1.03 [0.99–1.07] 0.03 0.02 1.03 [0.99–1.07]
AQ -0.04 0.03 0.96 [0.92–1.01]

Gender is coded 1 for females and 0 for males, education is coded 1 for high Educated and 0 for low educated. eB = exponentiated B, B = odds ratio. AQ = Autism Quotient.

* p < .001. R2 (Nagelkerke) = .02 for Model 1 and R2 (Nagelkerke) = .02 for Model 2.