Table 2. Logistic regression analysis for variables predicting religiosity by atheists (N = 29,348) and theists (N = 19,575) in Study 1, controlling for background variables.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE B | eB | [95% CI] | B | SE B | eB | [95% CI] | |
Intercept | -1.08 | <0.01 | -0.99 | <0.01 | ||||
Gender | 0.01* | <0.01 | 1.01 | [1.01–1.02] | 0.01* | <0.01 | 1.01 | [1.01–1.02] |
Age | 0.46* | -0.02 | 1.59 | [1.53–1.64] | 0.46* | 0.02 | 1.58 | [1.53–1.64] |
Education | 0.03 | -0.02 | 1.03 | [0.99–1.07] | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.03 | [0.99–1.07] |
AQ | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.96 | [0.92–1.01] |
Gender is coded 1 for females and 0 for males, education is coded 1 for high Educated and 0 for low educated. eB = exponentiated B, B = odds ratio. AQ = Autism Quotient.
* p < .001. R2 (Nagelkerke) = .02 for Model 1 and R2 (Nagelkerke) = .02 for Model 2.