Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182764

Table 4. Logistic regression analysis for variables predicting religiosity by atheists (N = 240) and theists (N = 168) in Study 3, controlling for background variables.

Model 1 Model 2
B SE B eB [95% CI] B SE B eB [95% CI]
Intercept 1.13 0.52 -0.04 0.95
Gender 0.01 0.22 1.01 [0.65–1.57] 0.05 0.23 1.06 [0.68–1.64]
Age -0.01 0.02 0.69 [0.95–1.04] -0.01 0.02 0.99 [0.95–1.04]
AQ 0.53 0.37 1.71 [0.83–3.50]

Gender is coded 1 for females and 0 for males. eB = exponentiated B, B = odds ratio. AQ = Autism Quotient. None of the models was significant. R2 (Nagelkerke) < .01 for Model 1 and R2 (Nagelkerke) = .01 for Model 2.