Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 May 5;156:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.004

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Younger versus Older classification using FNC measures between FNs based on 50 FNs. (A) Classification accuracy of 50 runs of 10-fold cross-validation. (B) Mean FNC pattern of younger (lower triangular part) and older group (upper triangular part). The FNs are grouped into visual, somatomotor, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, frontoparietal, and default networks, as shown in (D), and their FN IDs are shown in the diagonal elements. (C) Top 5% (61) FNC measures selected by the classification models according to their average weights from 50 runs. Colored text indicates the FN IDs, red/blue lines indicate FNC measures increase/decrease from younger to older group, solid/dashed lines indicate positive/negative average FNC measures, and line thickness indicates their average weights in the classification models.