Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb 22;46(4):1149–1158. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25663

Table 5.

Multivariate linear regression tables after adjustment for PDFF

Regression DWI-derived Parameter
Model Coefficient ADC [95% CI] (10−3 mm2/s) D [95% CI] (10−3 mm2/s)
1 Steatosis −0.06 [−0.09, −0.03]
p<0.001
−0.36 [−1.66, 0.94]
p = 0.58
Fibrosis 0.01 [−0.02, 0.04]
p = 0.37
−1.87 [−3.26, −0.47],
p = 0.009
Lobular Inflammation 0.01 [−0.04, 0.06],
p = 0.82
1.54 [−0.94, 4.01]
p = 0.22
Portal Inflammation −0.01 [−0.06, 0.04]
p = 0.73
−1.00 [−3.46, 1.46]
p = 0.42
Hepatocellular Ballooning −0.02 [−0.06, 0.02]
p = 0.37
−0.51 [−2.39, 1.37]
p = 0.59
2 Steatosis 0.06 [0.09,0.04]
p < 0.001
−0.51 [−1.73, 0.72]
p = 0.41
Fibrosis 0.01 [−0.02, 0.03]
p = 0.50
2.17 [3.40,0.94]
p < 0.001
NASH 0.01 [−0.04, 0.05]
p = 0.81
2.13 [−0.19, 4.46]
p=0.07

Results of multivariate linear regression post-adjustment for PDFF is shown. The coefficient and significance of the effect is shown for each histologic feature of NAFLD. Coefficients with p < 0.05 are bolded for visibility