Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2017 Feb 23;73(4):1123–1131. doi: 10.1111/biom.12670

Table 4.

Prevalence of and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for HIV seropositivity among 7,116 adult men in Zambia according to method of adjustment for HIV testing non-participation.

Prevalence (95% CI)
Unadjusted
 Complete case analysis 12.2% (11.2%, 13.1%)

Adjusteda
 Inverse probability weighting 12.4% (11.5%, 13.3%)
 Outcome regression 12.5% (11.8%, 13.2%)
 Doubly robust estimator 12.5% (11.6%, 13.4%)
 Heckman-type selection 21.0% (19.8%, 22.2%)
 Instrumental variable
  Fixed effects 21.1% (16.2%, 25.9%)
  Mixed effects 21.2% (12.6%, 29.8%)
a

All adjustment methods considered the following set of covariates: age (in 5-year categories), wealth (in quintiles), educational attainment (in years) and location type of household.