Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;7:9212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07790-9

Table 3.

Prevalence and proportion of total reads for “species” detected in at least 50% of samples.

Nearest neighboura % OTU identity range Prevalence/182 (%) % total reads
Lactobacillus jensenii 81.6–100 181 (99.4) 10.66
Streptococcus devriesei 83 180 (98.9) 0.34
Lactobacillus crispatus 78.8–99.8 178 (97.8) 31.93
Lactobacillus acidophilus 91.8–100 178 (97.8) 1.22
Atopobium vaginae 82.5–96.9 176 (96.7) 1.62
Weissella viridescens 58.8–99.5 173 (95.0) 0.22
Desulfotalea psychrophila 76.1 167 (91.7) 0.12
Lactobacillus iners 86.8–100 165 (90.6) 15.85
Lactobacillus gasseri 65.4–100 164 (90.1) 5.69
Streptococcus parasanguinis 94.9–97.0 162 (89.0) 0.08
Prevotella tannerae 77.5–98.7 162 (89.0) 0.07
Faecalibacterium cf. prausnitzii 77.5–79.6 159 (87.3) 0.16
Gardnerella vaginalis subgroup C 78.5–99.3 156 (85.7) 4.45
Peptoniphilus harei 89.9–98.5 156 (85.7) 0.07
Clostridium innocuum 75.4 148 (81.3) 0.06
Sphingobium yanoikuyae 99.3–99.4 145 (79.6) 0.08
Eubacterium siraeum 84.4 144 (79.1) 0.05
Gardnerella vaginalis subgroup B 93.2–99.6 133 (73.0) 0.54
Massilia timonae 82 126 (69.2) 0.03
Gardnerella vaginalis subgroup A 86.7–99.6 123 (67.5) 7.64
Bifidobacterium breve 89.6–99.5 119 (65.3) 2.12
Megasphaera sp. genomsp. type 1 58.1–86.7 112 (61.5) 3.09

aClosest match in the cpnDB reference database based on sequence identity.