Table 2.
5 top-ranked results for the frequency analysis for MC signatures.
| Predicted node | Sign | FS NPC | FS MC | p.val (Fisher) | References | Connectivity | OVE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | |||||||
| JUN/FOS[n] | − | 0.444 | 0.956 | 2.65E-005 | 38–42 | 8/529 | 373 | 137 |
| FOXM1*[c] | − | 0.222 | 0.774 | 7.97E-004 | 43, 44 | 529/529 | 85 | 265 |
| STAT6*[c] | − | 0.222 | 0.764 | 1.05E-003 | ∅ | 8/529 | 30 | 429 |
| EGF/EGFR*[m] | + | 0.556 | 0.935 | 2.08E-003 | 45–47 | 529/529 | 79 | 4 |
| Src* | + | 0.556 | 0.935 | 2.08E-003 | 48–50 | 529/529 | 110 | 48 |
FS NPC and FS MC show the frequency scores for NPC and MC, respectively. The references column lists the publications that agreed with our sign prediction. Connectivity refers to the ratio of genes connected to each predicted node. The OVE (observed variant expression) shows the repartition of variant gene expression using the best precision threshold without considering graph information.