Table 4.

Regression analysis on the effects of grouping, online-visiting frequency, and online engagement on outcome variables with adjustment for age, gender, and sexual orientation.

Outcome variables			Beta (regression coefficient)	95% CI	P
Condom use attitude
	Online-visiting frequency		.02	-0.08 to 0.13	.66
	Online engagement (control as reference)
		Low	.03	-0.13 to 0.19	.73
		Medium	.08	-0.17 to 0.32	.55
		High	.01	-0.31 to 0.33	.96
Contraceptive use behavioral intention
	Online-visiting frequency		.14	0 to 0.28	.05
	Online engagement (control as reference)
		Low	.01	-0.20 to 0.22	.92
		Medium	.21	-0.11 to 0.54	.19
		High	-.05	-0.46 to 0.37	.83
The perceived difficulty and ease of condom use
	Online-visiting frequency		.16	0.03 to 0.30	.02
	Online engagement (control as reference)
		Low	.01	-0.20 to 0.21	.96
		Medium	-.06	-0.37 to 0.26	.73
		High	-.09	-0.50 to 0.32	.66
Condom use frequency (n=40)
	Online-visiting frequency		.65	0.18 to 1.27	.04
	Online engagement (control as reference)
		Low	-.15	-1.08 to 0.78	.74
		Medium	-.38	-1.58 to 0.82	.52
		High	-.59	-2.32 to 1.14	.50