Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;23(31):5746–5754. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5746

Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons of receiver-operating characteristic curves

PNALT PIALT1 PIALT2 All patients
APRI vs FIB-4
Difference between areas 0.0628 0.0169 0.068 0.00904
Standard error 0.0557 0.0699 0.0738 0.0245
95%CI -0.046 to 0.172 -0.120 to 0.154 -0.077 to 0.213 -0.039 to 0.057
z statistic 1.129 0.242 0.921 0.369
P value 0.2588 0.8087 0.3569 0.712
APRI vs LSM
Difference between areas 0.256 0.124 0.0263 0.111
Standard error 0.104 0.0896 0.0882 0.0518
95%CI 0.0525-0.459 -0.0511 to 0.30 -0.147 to 0.19 0.00909-0.212
z statistic 2.465 1.389 0.298 2.135
P value 0.0137 0.1649 0.7655 0.0327
FIB 4 vs LSM
Difference between areas 0.193 0.141 0.0417 0.102
Standard error 0.106 0.0938 0.0957 0.0531
95%CI -0.014 to 0.400 -0.0425 to 0.325 -0.146 to 0.229 -0.00246 to 0.206
z statistic 1.829 1.507 0.435 1.914
P value 0.0374 0.1318 0.663 0.0557