Table 1.
Parameters | Patients (cases) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Before operation | After operation | ||
Munk (scores) | 2–4 | 0–4 | |
Median 4 | Median 1 | ||
Purulent | Presence | 48 (100%) | 11 (22.9%) |
Discharge | Absence | – | 37 (77.1%) |
Depth of lacrimal meniscus (µm) | 425 ± 180 | 368 ± 135 | |
Dye disappearing test, cases (%) | Positive | – | 37 (77.1%) |
Negative | 47 (100%) | 11 (22.9%) | |
Washing of lacrimal passages, cases (%) | Free | – | 25 (52.1%) |
Thin jet | – | 12 (25%) | |
Not passable | 47 (100%) | 11 (22.9%) | |
Endorinoscopy of EEDCR, cases (%) | Epithelial lining | – | 37 (77.1%) |
Cicatricial deformity | – | 11 (22.9%) |
“Recovery” was observed in 25 cases (52.1%), “improvement” – in 12 cases (25%), “relapse” – in 11 cases (22.9%). Thus, positive results after the operation were recorded in 37 cases (77.1%), negative – in 11 cases (22.9%).