Table 2. Composition of the optimised samples with estimated responses and cross-validation of the model.
| Value | After preparation | t=3 h | Desir- ability |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH=1.5 | pH=6.8 | ||||||||||||
|
w(ALG) % |
w(SPI) % |
w(CaCl2) % |
tinlet °C |
N(viable cell) log CFU/g |
N(viable cell) log CFU/g |
N(viable cell) log CFU/g |
|||||||
| Predicted Actual Bias/% |
1.01 1 |
1.27 1.3 |
0 0 |
90 90 |
11.55 11.41 –1.21 |
96.21 95.05 –1.21 |
9.99 9.47 –5.21 |
87.99 83.03 –5.64 |
9.50 9.00 –5.26 |
85.24 78.91 –7.43 |
0.883 | ||
| Predicted Actual Bias/% |
4 4 |
3.95 4 |
0 0 |
140.74 141 |
10.84 11.55 6.55 |
90.34 96.23 6.52 |
10.57 9.43 –10.79 |
93.26 81.17 –12.96 |
8.31 8.63 3.85 |
71.34 74.74 4.77 |
0.856 | ||
| Predicted Actual Bias/% |
4 4 |
1 1 |
0 0 |
131.23 132 |
11.40 11.67 2.37 |
95.00 97.25 2.37 |
10.09 10.05 –0.39 |
92.49 86.12 –6.89 |
8.41 9.47 12.60 |
74.02 81.15 9.63 |
0.811 | ||
ALG=alginate, SPI=soy protein isolate