Table 3.
Individual interviews |
About the observed practice • The preparation of the facilitator and the practice • Their descriptions and experience of the meetings (structure, dialogue, what worked well and what did not) • Their own role at the facilitation visits and in the change process • The practice impact from the facilitation visits • What they perceived as successful/less successful in the specific practice • How the observed facilitation visit differed from other practices and similarities between practices |
About their general perception and practice • Their understanding of the facilitator intervention • Their contribution as facilitators • How they were prepared for the role as facilitator • What had influenced their understanding and enactment facilitation • Variations between facilitators and practices • The implication of being GPs • Thoughts about project design (number of facilitation visits, meetings in the practice etc.) |
Focus groups |
Focus group 1 • Their understanding and description of the facilitator intervention • Their preparation • The content of facilitation visits • Facilitator variations and unity • Their tools • The impact for the practices • The good facilitation visit • Their competences |
Focus group 2 • Their understanding of facilitation and the roles of the facilitator • If and why some roles were more often applied • What influenced their roles • Whether they had collaborated on a common understanding • Improvements of their performance over time • Their competences • The significance of them being GPs |
Project initiators and project managers |
• Background for the intervention • The intervention design • Their understandings of facilitation • The education of the facilitators • Expected changes • Intervention flexibility |