Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;67(662):e643–e649. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692153

Table 2.

Outcomes for the RCT and adjusted and unadjusted outcomes for the observational study

Duration of symptomsa
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Symptom severityb
Mean difference (95% CI)
New/worsening symptomsc
Odds ratio (95% CI)
RCT Results controlling for baseline severity 1.06 (0.96 to 1.18) −0.07 (−0.15 to 0.007) 0.97 (0.63 to 0.99)d
Observational study Results controlling for baseline severity 0.92 (0.76 to 1.11) 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) 1.04 (0.64 to 1.67)
Results controlling for baseline severity and confounding variables 0.92 (0.73 to 1.16) −0.01 (−0.19 to 0.17) 0.85 (0.48 to 1.51)
Results using propensity score weight 1.06 (0.80 to 1.40) −0.07 (−0.34 to 0.20) 0.91 (0.48 to 1.66)
a

Resolution of symptoms rated ‘moderately bad’ or worse in treatment versus no treatment group.

b

Difference of mean symptom severity score on days 2–4 after consultation between groups.

c

Worsening of illness in the treatment group versus no treatment.

d

Significant at P<0.05. CI = confidence interval. RCT = randomised controlled trial.