Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;6(7):1–6. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix041

Table 3:

Comparison of genome assembly and gene number for 15 reptiles with published genomes

Species Common name Sequencing platform Sequence coverage (×) Assembled genome size (Gb) Contig N50 (kb) Scaffold N50 (kb) Gap ratio (%) Gene number Reference
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator NGS 156.0 2.17 7.0 509 2.09 23 323 [40]
Alligator sinensis Chinese alligator NGS 109.0 2.30 23.4 2188 3.17 22 200 [41]
Anolis carolinensis Green anole lizard Sanger 6.0 1.78 79.9 4033 4.49 17 472 [42]
Chrysemys picta bellii Western painted turtle Sanger + NGS 18.0 2.59 11.9 5212 7.64 21 796 [43]
Chelonia mydas Green sea turtle NGS 82.3 2.24 20.4 3778 4.33 19 633 [44]
Crocodylus porosus Saltwater crocodile NGS 74.0 2.12 32.8 205 5.30 13 321 [40]
Deinagkistrodon acutus Five-pacer viper NGS 114.2 1.47 22.4 2122 5.29 21 194 [45]
Eublepharis macularius Leopard gecko NGS 135.8 2.02 20.0 664 1.76 24 755 [26]
Gavialis gangeticus Indian gharial NGS 81.0 2.88 14.2 127 2.22 14 043 [40]
Gekko japonicus Japanese gecko NGS 131.3 2.55 21.1 685 3.54 22 487 [46]
Ophiophagus hannah King cobra NGS 28.0 1.66 4.0 226 13.5 18 579 [19]
Pelodiscus sinensis Soft-shell turtle NGS 105.6 2.21 21.9 3331 4.35 23 649 [44]
Pogona vitticeps Australian dragon lizard NGS 179.1 1.82 31.3 2290 3.78 19 406 [20]
Python molurus bivittatus Burmese python NGS 20.0 1.44 10.7 208 3.52 25 385 [18]
Shinisaurus crocodilurus Chinese crocodile lizard NGS 149 2.24 11.7 1470 7.98 20 150