Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;10(4):516–523. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw142

Table 2.

Interventions

Intervention component Details
1. Clinical staff education sessions
  • Project lead delivery of one-to-one or group sessions (method of delivery adapted to suit the satellite site)

  • Interactive PowerPoint presentation consisting of current guidelines, evidence-base for EOD, improvement strategies identified and developed at satellite site A, objectives of the QI project

  • Opportunity for clinical staff to voice concerns/share perceived barriers and project lead–facilitated collaborative problem solving

2. Appointment of permanent clinical staff advocate for EOD (Exercise Link Practitioner)
  • Exercise link practitioners at each site appointed prior to intervention commencement (nurse or HCA)

  • Responsibility: facilitating EOD programme in project lead’s absence

  • Training provided: patient and staff motivation, background details on motivation schemes, identification of patient for review, reporting equipment issues and maintaining exercise lists

  • Link practitioners encouraged to contact the physiotherapist for support if necessary at any time

  • Sites D and E each appointed one link practitioner, sites B and C appointed two. The difference reflected staffing levels at different sites

3. Motivational schemes and improved access to literature promoting EOD
  • Display posters by TIME renal rehabilitation [26] on the dialysis units

  • Introduction of TIME ‘Cycle around Britain’ map [26]. This encourages participants to mark off blocks of time to reflect exercise duration on a graphic map of the UK, receiving postcards along the way and a certificate upon completion

  • Supply leaflets to unit waiting areas, optimizing access to information for all patients attending dialysis

4. Patient education sessions
  • Provision of one-to-one 10-min education session to patient participants by project lead

  • Interactive PowerPoint presentation (at chairside during dialysis) consisting of benefits and risks of EOD, cycle ergometry rationale

  • Discussion encouraged, with additional content adapted to individual

  • Patients offered opportunity for a personalized EOD review or initial assessment if they have yet to commence EOD

  • Education sessions complemented by a leaflet reiterating content

5. Improvement and standardization in documentation of EOD
  • Assessment sheet created in line with evidence-based guidelines and completed for each participant

  • Outcome measures and patient-centred goals recorded

  • Quick identification of EOD activity facilitated by the use of a ‘traffic light system’ indicating the level of necessary support from nursing staff

6. Provision of appropriate and fully functioning equipment
  • Equipment at sites assessed and documented

  • Storage issues identified and solutions identified

  • Faulty equipment identified and repairs facilitated/alternatives supplied

  • Recommendations for purchase of new equipment drafted and supplied to clinical staff

7. Provision of training and support for clinical staff
  • Provision of education and demonstration

  • Guidelines drafted and made available to all clinical staff

  • Practice sessions organized

  • Provision of training/supporting documents adapted to suit the needs of the unit, responding to variations in equipment, environment and staff