Table 3:
Read alignment | ||
---|---|---|
Sample | Total reads | ratea (%) |
Control mix 1 replicate A | 18 816 478 | 97.05 |
Control mix 1 replicate C | 17 883 449 | 97.11 |
Control mix 2 replicate A | 20 343 317 | 97.18 |
Control mix 1 replicate C | 18 138 322 | 97.91 |
T1 D1 replicate A | 20 027 063 | 88.15 |
T1 D1 replicate B | 21 175 617 | 90.22 |
T2 D1 replicate A | 18 173 778 | 90.12 |
T2 D1 replicate B | 21 705 055 | 91.02 |
T2 D3 replicate A | 21 282 134 | 97.12 |
T2 D3 replicate B | 21 112 818 | 96.84 |
Y1 D1 replicate A | 20 196 267 | 96.04 |
Y1 D1 replicate B | 20 404 693 | 96.39 |
Y2 D1 replicate A | 18 384 104 | 93.13 |
Y2 D1 replicate B | 18 960 301 | 92.61 |
Y2 D3 replicate A | 20 731 661 | 96.66 |
Y2 D3 replicate B | 19 327 663 | 96.75 |
Y3 D1 replicate A | 19 843 426 | 94.48 |
Y3 D1 replicate B | 21 559 192 | 94.29 |
Y3 D3 replicate A | 19 533 468 | 96.69 |
Y3 D3 replicate B | 19 258 370 | 95.77 |
aSequencing reads from each sample (pre-filtered to remove grapevine matches) were aligned against the wine reference consortium (Table S3).