Table 3.
MRI Alone | MRI + PET | IE | Cost [€] | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 0.47 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 1182.43 |
SD | 0.04 | 0.03 | 585.86 | |
Minimum | 0.33 | 0.81 | 0.48 | 48.33 |
2.50% | 0.38 | 0.83 | 0.45 | 329.62 |
10% | 0.42 | 0.85 | 0.43 | 520.7 |
Median | 0.47 | 0.9 | 0.43 | 1085.59 |
90% | 0.53 | 0.94 | 0.41 | 1965.59 |
97.50% | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.39 | 2570.81 |
Maximum | 0.58 | 0.96 | 0.38 | 4484.82 |
The 2 center columns represent the 2 alternative diagnostic strategies applying MRI alone or MRI combined with FET PET. The values show the probability of obtaining a correct diagnosis (rounded to 2 decimal places). IE = incremental effectiveness (ie, the benefit that results by adding FET PET to MRI). The right column shows the cost of adding FET PET. SD = standard deviation.