Skip to main content
. 2017 May 26;32(9):997–1004. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4078-y

Table 2.

Characteristics of 804 FQHC Sites Applying to the FQHC Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration

Characteristic All Sites (N = 804) No Equivalent Recognition Sites (N = 97) Level 1, 2, or 3 Equivalent Recognition Sites (N = 707)
PCMH capabilities (NCQA 2011 PCMH recognition level equivalent scores), n (%):
 No recognition equivalent (<35 points) 97 (12.1) 97 (100.0)
 Level 1 equivalent (35–59 points) 304 (37.8) 304 (43.0)
 Level 2 equivalent (60–85 points) 324 (40.3) 324 (45.8)
 Level 3 equivalent (≥85 points) 79 (9.8) 79 (11.2)
Number of FQHC service delivery sites, n (%):
 1 23 (2.9) 2 (2.1) 21 (3.0)
 2–10 439 (54.7) 43 (44.3) 396 (56.1)
 11+ 341 (42.5) 52 (53.6) 289 (40.9)
Years in operation, n (%):
 1–9 259 (32.2) 31 (32.0) 228 (32.2)
 10–19 216 (26.9) 28 (28.9) 188 (26.6)
 20–29 109 (13.6) 10 (10.3) 99 (14.0)
 30–39 148 (18.4) 12 (12.4) 136 (19.2)
 40+ 49 (6.1) 8 (8.2) 41 (5.8)
 Missing 23 (2.9) 8 (8.2) 15 (2.1)
Geographic region, n (%):
 Central 194 (24.1) 21 (21.6) 173 (24.5)
 Mid-Atlantic 118 (14.7) 34 (35.1) 84 (11.9)
 Northeast 96 (11.9) 2 (2.1) 94 (13.3)
 Southeast 121 (15.0) 12 (12.4) 109 (15.4)
 West 139 (17.3) 14 (14.4) 125 (17.7)
 West-Central 136 (16.9) 14 (14.4) 122 (17.3)
Metropolitan status, n (%):
 Metropolitan area 548 (68.2) 74 (76.3) 474 (67.0)
 Non-metropolitan urban area 155 (19.3) 18 (18.6) 137 (19.4)
 Non-metropolitan rural area 101 (12.6) 5 (5.2) 96 (13.6)
Receiving PCMH payments from one or more plans, n (%) 81 (10.1) 11 (11.3) 70 (9.9)
Payer mix, mean (SD)
 Commercial insurance 18.1 (12.9) 18.3 (13.3) 18.1 (12.9)
 Medicaid 34.1 (15.1) 33.3 (16.7) 34.2 (14.8)
 Medicare (includes dual-eligibles) 15.1 (9.9) 15.1 (10.9) 15.1 (9.8)
 No insurance 27.1 (15.6) 26.3 (15.8) 27.2 (15.6)
 Other 0.6 (0.5) 0.7 (0.5) 0.6 (0.5)

Notes: NCQA = National Committee for Quality Assurance; PCMH = patient-centered medical home. PCMH capabilities were assessed using NCQA’s 2011 application for PCMH recognition, which awards points for meeting each of NCQA’s recognition standards. We used point totals to define four levels of PCMH capabilities equivalent to each of NCQA’s PCMH recognition levels (or no recognition). Because each site’s responses did not undergo review by NCQA auditors, these categories do not necessarily reflect a site’s true recognition level. The results displayed in the table are not propensity score-weighted