Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):e00189-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00189-17

TABLE 3.

Clinical outcomes in phases 1 and 2 of postintervention perioda

Outcomeb Phase 1 (n = 182) Phase 2 (n = 151) P value
Microbiology results (median [IQR]) (days)
    Gram stain 0.7 (0.7–0.7) 0.7 (0.6–0.7) 0.28
    Organism identification 1.7 (1.7–1.9) 0.8 (0.7–0.8) <0.001
    Final antimicrobial susceptibility report 3.3 (2.9–3.8) 3.0 (2.7–3.9) 0.93
Empirical antimicrobial therapy within 48 h (n [%])
    Combination therapy 26 (14) 23 (15) 0.81
    Antipseudomonal agents 133 (73) 119 (79) 0.22
    Carbapenems 22 (12) 10 (7) 0.10
Appropriate empirical therapy within 48 h (n [%])
    Overall 173 (95) 144 (95) 0.90
    Pitt bacteremia score of ≥4 27/28 (96) 36/37 (97) 0.99
    BSI due to P. aeruginosa/CAE 34/36 (94) 32/32 (100) 0.49
Time to de-escalation (median [IQR]) (days)c
    Combination therapy 2.0 (1.0–2.8) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 0.03
    Antipseudomonal beta-lactams 2.7 (2.5–3.0) 2.2 (2.0–2.5) 0.04
    Carbapenems 2.8 (2.0–3.3) 2.1 (1.0–2.9) 0.32
a

Phase 1, MALDI-TOF MS; phase 2, MALDI-TOF MS plus FilmArray BCID.

b

IQR, interquartile range; CAE, AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

c

Numbers of subjects eligible for de-escalation in phases 1 and 2 of the postintervention period were 26 and 23 for combination therapy, 87 and 69 for antipseudomonal beta-lactams, and 35 and 17 for carbapenems, respectively.