Table 1.
Genetic diversity of eight SSRs in the wild olive tree population (n = 225)
Marker | Na | HO | HE | FIS | fnull |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCA-03 | 13 | 0·482 | 0·607 | 0·206*** | 0·077 |
DCA-09 | 18 | 0·897 | 0·892 | −0·006ns | – |
DCA-11 | 8 | 0·717 | 0·663 | −0·082ns | – |
DCA-16 | 26 | 0·897 | 0·915 | 0·020** | – |
DCA-18 | 15 | 0·890 | 0·891 | 0·001ns | – |
GAPU-103A | 18 | 0·512 | 0·656 | 0·220*** | 0·086 |
UDO-24 | 13 | 0·712 | 0·711 | −0·002ns | – |
UDO-43 | 22 | 0·647 | 0·832 | 0·224*** | 0·100 |
Na, number of alleles; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient. Significance of the departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: ***, significance at the 0·1 % nominal level; **, significance at the 1 % nominal level; *, significance at the 5 % nominal level and ‘ns’ depicts non-significant values; fnull, null-allele frequency as estimated by Brookfield’s formula (Brookfield, 1996) for the loci for which the presence of null alleles was detected using MICRO-CHECKER (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004).