Table 3.
Group/ Post wounding days |
Wound area (cm2) | % of wound contraction at the end of the study | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st day | 4th day | 8th day | 12th day | 16th day | ||
Group I | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Group II | 4.90 ± 1.13 | 4. 90 ± 1.20 | 4.85 ± 0.88 | 4.72 ± 0.89 | 4.60 ± 0.93 | 6.12 |
Group III | 4.90 ± 1.11 | 4.83 ± 1.05† | 4.58 ± 1.17† | 3.76 ± 0.59† | 3.14 ± 0.36† | 35.92 |
Group IV | 4.90 ± 1.03 | 4.70 ± 0.91† | 4.50 ± 0.86† | 3.23 ± 0.65† | 2.71 ± 0.40* | 44.69 |
Group V | 4.90 ± 1.10 | 4.58 ± 1.07† | 4.16 ± 0.88† | 2.48 ± 0.33* | 1.89 ± 0.35** | 61.42 |
Group VI | 4.90 ± 1.12 | 4.51 ± 1.01† | 4.35 ± 0.76† | 3.26 ± 0.33† | 2.95 ± 0.54* | 39.79 |
Group VII | 4.90 ± 1.16 | 4.83 ± 1.21† | 4.55 ± 0.73† | 3.92 ± 0.58† | 3.29 ± 0.37† | 32.86 |
Group VIII | 4.90 ± 0.88 | 4.75 ± 1.03† | 4.47 ± 0.68† | 3.41 ± 0.56† | 3.12 ± 0.49† | 36.32 |
Each value is Mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant difference from the diabetic wound control using ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (** p < 0.01). (†) indicates statistically no significant difference from the diabetic wound control using ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). Group I = normal control, Group II = Diabetic wound control, Group III = Diabetic wound control +100 mg ethanolic extract of E. hirta, Group IV = Diabetic wound control +200 mg ethanolic extract of E. hirta, Group V = Diabetic wound control +400 mg ethanolic extract of E. hirta, Group VI = Diabetic wound control +5% Povidone iodine, Group VII = Diabetic wound control +5% ethanolic extract of E. hirta, Group VIII = Diabetic wound control +10% ethanolic extract of E. hirta