Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Geophys Res Atmos. 2014 Feb 6;119(3):1612–1625. doi: 10.1002/2013JD020757

Table 5.

Temporal Trends of FPH –MLS Differences in Profile Group B1a

Pressure(hPa) Boulder
Hilo
Lauder
Trendb
(ppmv yr−1)		 Uncertaintyc
(ppmv yr−1)		 Trend
(ppmv yr−1)		 Uncertainty
(ppmv yr−1)		 Trend
(ppmv yr−1)		 Uncertainty
(ppmv yr−1)
26 0.11 0.26 0.09 0.23
32 0.07 0.08 −0.01 0.79 0.02 0.10
38 0.03 0.05 0.18 0.72 0.01 0.08
46 0.01 0.04 −0.06 0.41 −0.01 0.06
56 0.02 0.04 −0.04 0.39 −0.01 0.06
68 0.00 0.04 −0.12 0.38 0.00 0.05
83 0.01 0.04 −0.06 0.39 −0.01 0.05
100 0.04 0.04 −0.01 0.40 −0.03 0.05
a

None of the trends are statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence.

b

Trends are slopes of weighted linear regression fits to FPH – MLS differences in profile group B1.

c

Trend uncertainties are the 95% confidence limits of regression slopes.