Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2009 Jan 1;42(2):164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.016

Table 2.

Average (std) feedback delay and critical delay for each subject, and average error between experimental and model data for upper and lower body angle (deg) and velocity (deg/s).

Subject Delay (ms) Critical delay (ms) θ1 error (deg) θ2 error (deg) θ̇1 error (deg/s) θ̇2 error (deg/s) Quantitative performance (deg/s) Qualitative performance
1 22(9) 45(6) 1.2(0.4) 0.7(0.3) 3.5(0.9) 2.6(1.0) 5.4 (1.0) Average
2 13(4) 62(19) 1.3(0.2) 0.9(0.2) 4.3(0.9) 2.7(0.5) 6.5 (0.3) Average
3 17(5) 83(29) 0.6(0.4) 0.5(0.3) 1.5(0.5) 1.5(0.3) 3.6 (0.4) Good
4 25(13) 36(18) 1.9(0.4) 2.2(0.3) 8.1(0.9) 6.0(0.7) 7.2 (1.1) Bad
5 32(7) 82(33) 1.8(0.7) 4.4(1.1) 5.7(1.2) 8.1(1.9) 11.2 (2.0) Bad
6 27(7) 90(18) 1.3(0.4) 0.9(0.2) 2.7(0.6) 2.7(0.6) 5.0 (0.3) Good
7 22(7) 53(4) 0.5(0.3) 0.9(0.3) 1.7(0.3) 2.8(0.4) 4.4 (0.4) Good

Error represents the average error per sampling point during the 7 s trial. Quantitative performance represents the average lower body angular velocity (deg/s) during the trial from experimental data. Table values represent the average across five trials with standard deviations in parentheses.