Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiol J. 2017 Feb 2;24(1):25–34. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0004

Table 4.

Comparisons of thrombotic angiographic characteristics between lesions in Group 2 and Not-Group 2.

Characteristics Group 2 (n = 73) (highly probable coronary thrombus) vs. Not-Group 2 (n = 250)
Group 2 N (%) Not-Group 2 N (%) GEE OR (95% CI) P Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI)
Complex Ambrose morphology 5 (6.9) 14 (5.6) 1.07 (0.9, 1.31) 0.5 14 (8, 23) 94 (89, 96)
Presence of spherical, ovoid or irregular filling defect 10 (13.7) 1 (0.4) 60.8 (3.84, 961) 0.004 22 (13, 35) 100 (96, 100)
Presence of abrupt vessel cutoff with persistence of contrast 20 (27.4) 18 (7.2) 2.72 (1.12, 6.57) 0.03 32 (22, 45) 94 (89, 96)
Presence of intraluminal staining 9 (12.3) 3 (1.2) 8.18 (2.12, 31.6) 0.002 17 (9, 29) 99 (97, 100)
Presence of any coronary filling defect* 14 (19.2) 5 (2.0) 8.53 (2.7, 26.9) 0.0003 26 (16, 39) 98 (95, 99)

GEE OR — generalized estimating equations-estimated odds ratio between groups; CI — confidence interval

Group 2 — individual lesions with highly probable coronary thrombus [ST elevation in territory of >70% stenosis and elevated troponin]

*

Any coronary filling defect includes spherical, ovoid, irregular, hazy, occlusive filling defects and obstructive coronary dissections