Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2016 Jul 25;29(4):469–480. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1211614

Table 2.

Characteristics of social support scale (original scale=1–5; refined scale=0–2)

Original Scale (1–5) Refined Scale (0–2)
Wave (study visit) Mean Standard error Mean Standard error
38 3.4484 0.06946 1.2735 0.04827
39 3.3504 0.06267 1.208 0.04354
40 3.1971 0.05585 1.0899 0.0388
41 3.1868 0.05321 1.0974 0.03697
42 3.2035 0.05167 1.0893 0.0359
43 3.1421 0.05226 1.0533 0.03631
44 3.2311 0.05117 1.1046 0.03555
45 3.1857 0.05062 1.0976 0.03517
46 3.1533 0.05117 1.0657 0.03555
47 3.1788 0.05032 1.0824 0.03496
48 3.1961 0.05136 1.0882 0.03568
49 3.17 0.04906 1.0626 0.03409
50 3.2039 0.04858 1.0921 0.03375
Social support frequency, by subject Value % Value %
1 (no one) 3.2% 0 (low: 0–1 person) 24.2%
2 (one person) 21.0% -- --
3 (2–3 people) 38.7% 1 (medium: 2–3 people) 38.7%
4 (4–5 people) 23.7% -- --
5 (6 or more people) 13.2% 2 (high: 4 or more) 36.9%
Reliability assessment Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI
Intra-class coefficient 0.74 0.72, 0.77 0.72 0.70, 0.75
Within-subject variability 0.17 0.17, 0.18 0.38 0.36, 0.39

Models adjusted for wave, race/ethnicity, annual income below $20,000, ART adherence, bisexual behavior, recent sero-conversion, and syndemics count.