Table 6.
Thematic findings and examples by levels of the social ecological framework (SEF).
Main theme and SEFalevel | Subtheme | Sample quotes | |
Perception of vaccine barriers | |||
Parents and Patients | Sexual activity and promiscuity (n=69) | “Their parents’ opinions regarding the teen’s sexuality [obviate the] legitimacy of the vaccine.” | |
Vaccine refusal or reluctance (n=62) | “For some reason it is okay for women to have PAP exams but it is scandalous to get the vaccine that can prevent the cancer Pap exams detect.” | ||
Inadequate or incorrect parental knowledge (n=96) | “...very misinformed by relatives, or friends.” | ||
Low perceived risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (n=67) | “They underestimate the risks of not being vaccinated. And overestimate the risks of vaccination.” | ||
Providers | Vaccine not a priority (n=19) | “We occasionally forget the vaccine at sick visits.” | |
Not supportive of HPV vaccine (n=16) | “...[HPV vaccination] is a commercial success for HPV vaccines manufacturers; however, cervical cancer is not a pandemic disease and could be better controlled under personal choices than other diseases that [patients] must be vaccinated against.” “I live in a community where most teenagers are not sexually active until they get...It is hard to recommend a series of 3 somewhat painful shots to teenagers who are not planning to be sexually active until they get married.” |
||
More scientific evidence desired (n=13) | “...more science showing benefit in men.” | ||
Organizational | Cost (n=32) | “I recommend HPV in those that participate in VFC, but once they are 19 and older, it is too expensive.” “I’m a big proponent of vaccines, but the cost-benefit analysis of HPV just doesn’t support its widespread use. $400 is way too expensive…The HPV vaccines don’t obviate the need for pap smears, so what are we gaining here? Nothing.” “Make it free. Otherwise, I don’t have any plans to recommend it.” |
|
Completing follow-up doses (n=22) | “If it were not a series, they forget to finish it.” “Infrequent preventive visits. Difficulty completing the series.” |
||
Infrequency of visits (n=16) | “[There are] not enough well child visits to get in the entire series.” | ||
Perceptions of vaccine improvement strategies | |||
Parents and Patients | Education (n=81) | “Discussion about rates of infection in Utah especially in suburban areas and discussion about cervical cancer and its causes as a television campaign.” | |
Gender differences (n=23) | “Better information about genital warts, anal cancer and other diseases caused by HPV that affect boys, and can be minimized by use of the vaccine.” | ||
Providers | Cancer prevention focus (n=18) | “Focusing on cancer prevention ‘later in life’ is more effective—especially when the discussion can be combined with the discussion about meningococcal meningitis and tetanus/pertussis. [HPV vaccination] is just a routine part of the preteen triad of immunizations.” | |
Make HPV vaccination routine practice (n=17) | “To make it more routine like it is expected to get it in medical culture rather than this optional/additional vaccine.” | ||
Tailored recommendation (n=23) | “Discussing the fact that [patients] can be exposed from a future husband who did not know he was infected.” | ||
Educational information (n=22) | “I need some information sheets, reassurance sheets, on side effects and safety, which are easy to hand out.” | ||
Organizational | Public policy and standing orders (n=22) | “Adding it to the list of required vaccines for junior high and high school.” |
aSEF: social ecological framework.