Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;8:616. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00616

Table 2.

Sum of squares error (divided by 100) between experimental action potential duration (APD) rate dependence mean data (from Figure 8 in O'Hara et al., 2011) and the original O'Hara Rudy model (original ORd) (O'Hara et al., 2011), the original IKr-dyn ORd (Li et al., 2017) as well as the optimized IKr-dyn ORd under different conditions: control, mexiletine (blocks mainly INaL), HMR 1556 (blocks IKs), E-4031 (blocks IKr), BaCl2 (blocks IK1) and nisoldipine (blocks ICaL).

Experiment Sum of squares error
Original ORd Original IKr-dyn ORd Optimized IKr-dyn ORd
Control 17.20 18.82 22.63
Mexiletine (INaL) 92.92* 91.09 18.36
HMR 1556 (IKs) 56.35 57.08 55.34
E4031 (IKr) 145.03 144.87 72.33
Bacl2 (IK1) 29.83 67.47 11.41
Nisoldipine (ICaL) 5.29 54.62 4.76
Average 57.77 72.33 30.81
*

Error was calculated using the updated mexiletine IC50 data (Crumb et al., 2016); using the block suggested in the ORd paper of 90% INaL block (O'Hara et al., 2011), the sum of squares error is of 38.48, changing the average error to 48.70.